UK Parliament blocks Brexit without agreement – My Blog

The UK Parliament has voted to block a Brexit without agreement, endeavor and exterminate High Minister Boris Johnson to remove the country from the European Union with an orderly thinking.

The people of Parliament pressured the vote on Wednesday, one day after parliament withheld a clock to create just that.

Lawmakers are changing in a flash clip after Johnson decided to tilt Parliament for five weeks, from September 9th. Johnson – who promised to leave the European Union on October 31, with or without a Brexit agreement – effectively tried to restrict working day preference for MPs. It used to be a clear effort and to prevent Parliament from passing any form of law that perhaps happens to look at extending Brexit's deadline or blocking an exit without agreement.

However, it may be that, by chance, it may be accepted as true with the backfire, not for now: opposition parliamentarians mobilized quickly and persuaded 21 members of the generous Johnson Conservative Occasion to post them in the apprehension. of a surveillance of the parliamentary agenda so that they may be able to scale an invoice blocking a Brexit without agreement. (In total, the government, the no longer traditional parliamentarians – it's called advocates – solves the agenda.) These conservative rebels have accepted it as truth and have now been expelled from the celebration for their disloyalty; however, this ability also Johnson no longer has. . majority in Parliament.

The laws they handed in on Wednesday say that the minister must contemplate a 3-month extension of Brexit (except January 2020), except that he can somehow save a Brexit deal via Parliament by October 19 or Parliament explicitly votes to leave the EU without negotiating before that date.

Parliament is opposed to a no-compromise exit, and Johnson and the EU accept as truth, making no progress in renegotiating the agreement with Brexit, so that is true if an invoice is said that perhaps by chance, perhaps, as an extra, extend the divorce. (For those of you who protect the ranking, Brexit's new deadline used to be March 29, 2019, and has since been extended twice, until April, after October.)

Lawmakers want to make this a law at the end of the week. They delivered the necessary obstacle – obtaining the laws through Parliament's Commons Housing. Perhaps this may happen by chance now to the Lords' House (the upper house of Parliament, whose members are no longer elected), where another struggle will take place. If you pass by, you go to the queen, who has to present her "royal consent" in roar for her to become an appropriate law of Parliament. This final part is known as formality, because the queen in total is left out of politics.

However, Boris Johnson was not dazzling sitting idly while Parliament gave him the necessary defeats of his high ministry. Suddenly he began demanding general elections – on October 15, dazzling weeks before the Brexit deadline.

And lawmakers profoundly defeated that measure, also giving Johnson three direct defeats in Parliament and blocking the election. No less than for now.

Because? Magnificent, why?

Johnson no longer wants to extend Brexit because it would betray his advertising and marketing campaign promise to leave the EU in any trace on October 31.

So, based largely on Parliament's agreement, Johnson threatened the elections, which he is proposing for October 15. His thinking here makes more or less sense: he wants to support voter support and the full recount: “Watch out, I want to keep on Brexit, but this Parliament is blocking me, so I need your flesh as much as I have a parliament. Modern branding so I can save it. "

Others desire an election as well. The Opposition Occasion of Work sees a likelihood of knowing a prediction to revive the vitality and other professional parts of Live, cherish the resurgent liberal democrats, compare this as a probability of prevailing in the seats and recommend their view to terminate Brexit.

The thunder is that Parliament does not tell the truth that it wants to present an election to Johnson in its sentences. And I did not accept as true to create it, thanks to something known as Tight Period Parliaments Act 2011. This law says that a high minister cannot unilaterally nominate modern elections, except that a two-thirds majority consents.

Parliament voted 298 to 56 in favor of the elections – but quietly, quite immediately, of the two-thirds required to make this happen.

Johnson criticized opposition Labor chief Jeremy Corbyn after the vote. "I have to have him become the necessary head of opposition in the former Democratic former of our country to refuse the invitation to an election," he acknowledged.

Work does if truth is told it wants elections. Nonetheless, he absolutely indicated that he failed to strengthen the modern elections, except that this unaccounted bill becomes law, with the aim of compelling Johnson (or any future high minister) to request an extension of the EU as different from the EU. pulling the country out of the block without an agreement in order.

All of this is to assert that the UK is a way of heading for elections at some level; It's not clear when. However, the timeline is rarely more forgiving, with Brexit's silent October 31 deadline.

The election would happen to be a referendum on Brexit whenever that happens. If it arrives earlier than the October 31 deadline, this might be another chance for the people to mediate about what Brexit they want, or when they want Brexit to somehow admire.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *